She continued<\/a>: \u201cWe\u2019ve given them to them, but they are blocked by some of their views on guns. They have the three Gs: guns, gays, God (that would be a woman\u2019s right to choose). And the cultural issues cloud some of their reception of an argument that is really in their interests.\u201d<\/p>\nPelosi, however, may have been putting the chicken before the egg. It is entirely possible that it\u2019s not a love of guns that keep people from embracing her style of globalist politics. Rather, it\u2019s possible working-class Americans struggling to keep their heads above water recognize politicians like Pelosi have no understanding of or concern for people like them. Thus, they embrace self-reliance as a necessity, which includes equipping themselves for the defense of their homes and loved ones, including against the \u201cpour souls\u201d awaiting trial or serving time for violent crimes that members of Pelosi\u2019s party release from custody as a form of charity. Likewise, it might well make more sense for a beleaguered American to appeal to God for help than to a politician whose applause line is to refer that person and others like him as \u201cdeplorable\u201d and \u201cirredeemable.\u201d Recent history has, in fact, shown an unprecedented level of diversity<\/a> among those embracing their Second Amendment rights, including demographics whose support Pelosi and her party take for granted.<\/p>\nNancy Pelosi, to no surprise, soundly won her debate in Oxford, England. But time will tell whether her party\u2019s message of \u201clisten to your betters, give up your guns, and stop standing in the way of progress\u201d will have the same resonance here in the United States. One thing is for sure: Americans who disagree will have the opportunity to vote against that outlook this November.<\/p>\n
\u2014Courtesy of NRA-ILA<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
![\"HR](\"https:\/\/cdn0.thetruthaboutguns.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/AP_19056625781679.jpg\" "\\"Nancy")