{"id":2783,"date":"2024-01-08T20:04:34","date_gmt":"2024-01-08T20:04:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gunsandpride.com\/?p=2783"},"modified":"2024-01-08T20:04:34","modified_gmt":"2024-01-08T20:04:34","slug":"california-sensitive-places-law-blocked-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gunsandpride.com\/?p=2783","title":{"rendered":"California \u201cSensitive Places\u201d Law Blocked\u2014Again"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"td-post-featured-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cdn0.thetruthaboutguns.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/gavel.jpg\" data-caption=\"\"><noscript><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"696\" height=\"392\" class=\"entry-thumb td-modal-image\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn0.thetruthaboutguns.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/gavel.jpg\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn0.thetruthaboutguns.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/gavel.jpg 760w, https:\/\/www.thetruthaboutguns.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/gavel-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.thetruthaboutguns.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/gavel-600x338.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 696px) 100vw, 696px\" alt=\"\" title=\"gavel\"\/><\/noscript><\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"wp-next-post-navi\">\n<p>\nNext Post Coming Soon&#8230;\u25b6\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">California\u2019s off-again, on-again new law banning carry for concealed carry permit holders in more than two dozen locations is off again.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As many TTAG readers likely recall, on Dec. 20, U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney granted a preliminary injunction blocking the \u201csensitive places\u201d portion of the state\u2019s new carry law. At the time, Judge Carney called the law \u201crepugnant.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cAlthough the government may have some valid safety concerns, legislation regulating [concealed carry] permit holders\u2014the most responsible of law-abiding citizens seeking to exercise their Second Amendment rights\u2014seems an odd and misguided place to focus to address those safety concerns,\u201d Carney wrote in his ruling.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Just 10 days later, however, a three-judge panel of the 9<sup>th<\/sup> U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals <a href=\"https:\/\/fingfx.thomsonreuters.com\/gfx\/legaldocs\/xmvjrgxmmvr\/12302023california.pdf\">put Carney\u2019s injunction on hold<\/a> pending further review by that circuit court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThe district court\u2019s preliminary injunction issued on December 20, 2023, is temporarily stayed pending resolution of the motion for a stay pending appeal by the merits panel,\u201d the court wrote. \u201cIn granting an administrative stay, we do not intend to constrain the merits panel\u2019s consideration of the merits of these appeals in any way.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On Saturday, however, a last-minute appeal by the California Rifle &amp; Pistol Association (CRPA) resulted in the 9<sup>th<\/sup> Circuit court <a href=\"https:\/\/crpa.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/May-Order.pdf\">lifting the stay<\/a> on the district court\u2019s earlier injunction, once again blocking the law from being enforced.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThe emergency motion under Circuit Rule 27-3 for a stay pending appeal and for an interim administrative stay, the supplements, responses, and replies thereto, have been referred to the merits panel and the case is calendared for argument in April,\u201d the court wrote. \u201cThe administrative stay previously entered is dissolved.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The law would have banned permit holders from carrying concealed firearms in 26 different places, including churches, banks, hospitals and on public transportation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the Dec. 20 District court ruling, Judge Carney had said the state completely failed in its arguments that the law meets the second\u00a0<em>Bruen<\/em>\u00a0standard\u2014whether it was consistent with the nation\u2019s historical tradition of firearm regulation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cGiven the nation\u2019s history and tradition of protecting the core right to carry a firearm to those wishing to defend themselves and their families in case of confrontation, it is unsurprising that the government does not offer a single historical prohibition on carrying firearms at hospitals or medical offices, much less one limiting carry by a category of people that is particularly responsible and trained and whom the government has background checked,\u201d Judge Carney wrote. \u201cAnd the government has presented no evidence that this balance supports preventing people who have been through a thorough background check and training process to obtain a special permit to carry a concealed weapon from exercising their constitutional right to self-defense on public transportation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">With the latest ruling, that part of the law will remain blocked until the 9<sup>th<\/sup> Circuit rules on the merits of the case sometime in the future.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-next-post-navi\">\n<p>\nNext Post Coming Soon&#8230;\u25b6\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetruthaboutguns.com\/california-sensitive-places-law-blocked-again\/\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Next Post Coming Soon&#8230;\u25b6 California\u2019s off-again, on-again new law banning carry for concealed carry permit holders in more than two dozen locations is off again. As many TTAG readers likely recall, on Dec. 20, U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney granted a preliminary injunction blocking the \u201csensitive places\u201d portion of the state\u2019s new carry law. At [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2784,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2783","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-reviews"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunsandpride.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2783","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunsandpride.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunsandpride.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunsandpride.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunsandpride.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2783"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gunsandpride.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2783\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunsandpride.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2784"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunsandpride.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2783"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunsandpride.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2783"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunsandpride.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2783"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}